What ever happened to the McCain I actually liked? He was the only one who really had a crusade against K Street! Now he has changed to the point man for George Bush’s war in Iraq! McCain keeps chiding the democrats that if they believe the war is illegal and wrong then they should not vote to fund it. Well now that they have taken him up on his challenge he does not seem to like it. I have some questions for all of them. My first question is for my fellow democrats!
QUESTION: Why cannot we Democrats recognize that after a terrorist attack some good old fashion ASS KICKING is wholesome, Jungian Earth affirming and a genuine way of getting in touch with and “celebrating” our feelings as Americans! This extends not only to terrorist attacks but criminals on our streets who prey on law abiding citizens!
ANSWER: Oh dear now did I say something wrong? Well until you let your rage out of the closet you are going to see Republicans get away with the bull shit they so frequently do. The War in Iraq is not the same as the War on Terror. But none the less when a teacher enters a class room after a disruption and one student snickers, even if he did not participate in the disruption, he will be punished as an example.
That is why we went to war in Iraq and kicking Sadam’s butt using “SHOCK AND AWE” should make us all proud to be Americans. The problem is that we did not then quickly leave as doing so would be a great deterrent to rogue states. Both liberals and conservatives need to learn one very important lesson!
Rogue states do NOT fear being overthrown and turned into democracies! They simply FEAR BEING OVERTHROWN! It is easy for us to do the latter but far more difficult and costly do accomplish the former! Rogue states like Iran and North Korea went from FEAR to laughter when our definition of “winning” changed from merely overthrowing Saddamn to accomplishing a SOCIAL ENGINEERING EXPERIMENT!
Did Iraq pose a threat to us? No but like the snickering student they set themselves up with their arrogance and prior offences. We needed a whipping boy and they served the example until Bush did a Katrina in Iraq by changing our purpose by remaining to engage in a social engineering experiement!
QUESTION: If the war in Iraq is not a diversion from the War on Terror but essential to it, if the winning of the war in Iraq (however the latest Republican spin doctors currently define “winning”) is ESSENTIAL to our nations protection, then why not RE-INSTITUE THE DRAFT?
ANSWER: The Republicans know that if they reinstitute the draft it will contribute to the radicalization not only of American youth who will have to put their lives where “some” of them put their mouths, but it will have the same effect on their families! We NEVER had enough troops to engage in the SOCIAL ENGINEERING EXPERIMENT that Bush and his fellow travelers wanted to accomplish.
QUESTION: But wouldn’t the establishment of a secular democratic Iraq in the midst of the Muslim world be a great victory in the “War on Terror”.
ANSWER: Actually yes and no. Just as the re-introduction of the “draft” would increase our military options the negative side effects would create a harmful attitude shift here at home. Elsewhere Muslims would view Iraq as a European and especially as an “American” enclave. It would drive up the radicalization and recruitment of male Muslims both in the Muslim world and here at home. Nice idea but do you think even our so-called friends like Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States would support a democratic secular Iraq with their near absolute monarchies? A wise general picks his battle fields he does not want to win battles but the WAR! A wise general knows his strengths and weaknesses. Do you want to pay the price for a social engineering experiment in Iraq? Then reinstitute the draft! We never had enough troops!
Doesn’t the Republican social engineering experiment in Iraq sound like Jimmy Carter? We could have supported the Shah and his son in Iran, but no we chose to help his undermining by letting the popular will of Iran go to it’s completion! Look what the result was! Besides just because people can vote does not make it a democracy. It takes the rule of law. Yet even then they can still hate us!
Moving on to Guilliani, when WWII was being fought the British changed governments overnight after an election. Mayor Giuliani wanted to pass an “enabling act” that would extend his term of office after the events of 9-11.
QUESTION: What would happen to America and our way of life if Guilliani were president and we had a terrorist attack again!
ANSWER: The American people must follow a “strict constructionalist” approach and say NO to Guilliani and his propensity for desiring an “enabling act”. This is America and our constitution comes first. We survived a civil war we can survive terrorists without destroying our Constitution and way of life!
The time has come for the Silent Majority - America’s great Middle Class to stand up and be counted! We must demand more from both parties!